4.7 Article

Discovery of novel G9a/GLP covalent inhibitors for the treatment of triple-negative breast cancer

期刊

出版社

ELSEVIER FRANCE-EDITIONS SCIENTIFIQUES MEDICALES ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.ejmech.2023.115841

关键词

G9a/GLP; Histone methylation; Covalent inhibitors; TNBC

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study designed a series of novel G9a/GLP covalent inhibitors and discovered that compound ZZM-1220 exhibited strong anti-proliferative activity against triple-negative breast cancer. The drug could covalently bind to G9a/GLP and inhibit the production of H3K9me2, induce tumor cell apoptosis, and block the cell cycle progression. Moreover, ZZM-1220 demonstrated persistent inhibitory effects. Thus, ZZM-1220 holds promise as a lead compound for the development of G9a/GLP covalent inhibitors for the treatment of triple-negative breast cancer.
Triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) has become a serious threat to women's health. Research on epigenetic drugs is gradually deepening and is expected to provide new options for the treatment of TNBC. G9a/GLP has been shown to play an important role in the development of a variety of tumors, including TNBC. Most reported G9a/GLP inhibitors are reversible inhibitors, and covalent inhibitors with novel mechanisms of action are expected to offer unique advantages. In this study, we designed a series of novel G9a/GLP covalent inhibitors using a structure-based drug design strategy. Compound 7c (ZZM-1220) exhibited potent enzyme inhibitory activity and anti-TNBC proliferative activity. Our biochemical studies showed that ZZM-1220 could covalently bind to G9a/GLP and inhibit H3K9me2 in cells. It could significantly induce apoptosis of TNBC cells and block the cell cycle in the G2/M phase. It is worth noting that ZZM-1220 continuously inhibited the growth of cancer cells and the expression of H3K9me2 after washing out. These data suggested that ZZM-1220 could be used as a promising lead compound for the development of G9a/GLP covalent inhibitors for the treatment of TNBC.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据