4.7 Article

A Pixel-Level Segmentation Convolutional Neural Network Based on Global and Local Feature Fusion for Surface Defect Detection

出版社

IEEE-INST ELECTRICAL ELECTRONICS ENGINEERS INC
DOI: 10.1109/TIM.2023.3323004

关键词

Convolutional neural networks; Surface cracks; Convolutional neural network; feature fusion; global mapping branch (GMB); pixel-level segmentation; surface defect detection (SDD)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Surface defect detection is a crucial task in the smart industry. This research proposes a pixel-level segmentation convolutional neural network, MMPA-Net, based on multi-scale features, global mapping, feature pyramid, and attention mechanisms. MMPA-Net achieves state-of-the-art results on three public SDD datasets, outperforming other deep learning methods in terms of intersection over union (IoU).
Surface defect detection (SDD) is a fundamental task in the smart industry to ensure product quality. Due to the complexity and diversity of the industrial scenes and the low contrast and tiny sizes of the defect, it is still difficult to accurately segment the defect. To overcome these issues, this research studied the pixel-level segmentation convolutional neural network based on multi-scale features, global mapping, feature pyramid and attention mechanisms (MMPA-Net). First, the low- and high-level features are extracted as the multiscale network to enrich the defect features information. Second, the global and local feature fusion (GLF) with the global mapping branch (GMB) module is developed to gradually refine the defect details to promote the detection of defects with different sizes and shapes. Third, deep supervision is applied to the global feature map and multiscale prediction maps to train MMPA-Net. MMPA-Net has been conducted on three public SDD datasets, and the results show that MMPA-Net has achieved state-of-the-art results on the intersection over union (IoU) by comparing with other deep learning (DL) methods (NEU-Seg: 86.62%, DAGM 2007: 87.94%, MT: 84.23%).

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据