4.5 Article

Bile acids as putative social signals in Mozambique tilapia (Oreochromis mossambicus)

期刊

PHYSIOLOGY & BEHAVIOR
卷 272, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.physbeh.2023.114378

关键词

Bile acid; Faeces; Chemical communication; Cichlid; Behaviour; Reproduction

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Chemical cues, specifically bile acids found in feces, play a crucial role in attracting male Mozambique tilapia to reproductive females.
Chemical cues provide potential mates with information about reproductive status and resource-holding potential. In the Mozambique tilapia (Oreochromis mossambicus), males can distinguish female reproductive status through chemical cues, and accessibility of males to females depends on their position in the hierarchy, determined in part by chemical cues. Here, we hypothesized that tilapia faecal cues are attractive to conspecifics once released into the water. C18 solid-phase extracts of faeces from dominant males and pre-ovulatory females evoked stronger olfactory epithelium electrical responses (EOG) than, respectively, subordinate males and postspawning females. Mass spectrometry of the reverse-phase C18 high-performance liquid chromatography fractions of these extracts with highest EOG, identified by amino acids and bile acids. Faeces from pre-ovulatory females contain significantly higher concentrations of cholic acid (CA) and taurocholic acid (TCH) than both post-spawning females and males. A pool of amino acids had no effect on aggression or attraction in males. However, males were attracted to the scent of pre-ovulatory female faeces, as well as CA and TCH, when applied separately. This attraction was accompanied by increased digging behaviour compared to the odour of postspawning females. CA and TCH exert their action through separate receptor mechanisms. These findings are consistent with a role for faeces - and bile acids therein - in chemical communication in this species, acting as an attractant for males to reproductive females.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据