4.7 Review

Hydrogen production, transportation, utilization, and storage: Recent advances towards sustainable energy

期刊

JOURNAL OF ENERGY STORAGE
卷 73, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.est.2023.109207

关键词

Hydrogen; Production; Transportation; Utilization; Storage; Hydrogen economy

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This article assesses and summarizes the properties, production, transportation, utilization, and storage of hydrogen as an energy carrier. Various methods of hydrogen production are discussed, with photocatalytic water splitting technology being the most environmentally friendly. Underground hydrogen storage in a geologic porous medium is highlighted as the largest and most affordable storage capacity. However, further research is needed on the compatibility of hydrogen with reservoir fluid and other safety concerns.
Indubitably, hydrogen demonstrates sterling properties as an energy carrier and is widely anticipated as the future resource for fuels and chemicals. Herein, an updated assessment of progress recorded on the production, transportation, utilization, and storage of hydrogen is examined. Firstly, the numerous routes for the production of hydrogen from renewable and non-renewable sources are systematically demystified. Subsequently, the transportation framework for hydrogen is discussed. Moreover, the industrial application of hydrogen is elucidated and the existing hydrogen storage systems are chronologically analyzed. From the review of the literature, photocatalytic water splitting technology is the most environmentally benign method available for H2 production. Additionally, underground hydrogen storage in a geologic porous medium offers the largest and most affordable storage capacity for H2 gas. Nonetheless, the compatibility of H2 with reservoir fluid in porous media and other safety concerns has to be adequately understood to avoid preventable losses. Finally, the key research gaps were highlighted and potential areas for future research are proffered.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据