4.7 Review

The application of multi-omics in the respiratory microbiome: Progresses, challenges and promises

期刊

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.csbj.2023.10.016

关键词

Multi-Omics; Respiratory microbiome; Microbiome-host interaction; Respiratory diseases

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The study of the respiratory microbiome has entered a multi-omic era, where integrating different omic data types can provide comprehensive insights into the interaction between the lung microbiome and host immunity and inflammation in respiratory diseases. The application of multi-omics has advanced the field from associative assessment to causal understanding of the lung microbiome in the pathogenesis of respiratory diseases, although it still faces challenges in sample processing, data integration, and downstream validation.
The study of the respiratory microbiome has entered a multi-omic era. Through integrating different omic data types such as metagenome, metatranscriptome, metaproteome, metabolome, culturome and radiome surveyed from respiratory specimens, holistic insights can be gained on the lung microbiome and its interaction with host immunity and inflammation in respiratory diseases. The power of multi-omics have moved the field forward from associative assessment of microbiome alterations to causative understanding of the lung microbiome in the pathogenesis of chronic, acute and other types of respiratory diseases. However, the application of multi-omics in respiratory microbiome remains with unique challenges from sample processing, data integration, and downstream validation. In this review, we first introduce the respiratory sample types and omic data types applicable to studying the respiratory microbiome. We next describe approaches for multi-omic integration, focusing on dimensionality reduction, multi-omic association and prediction. We then summarize progresses in the application of multi-omics to studying the microbiome in respiratory diseases. We finally discuss current challenges and share our thoughts on future promises in the field.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据