4.5 Article

Post-traumatic growth in cancer survivors: What is its extent and what are important determinants?

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijchp.2023.100418

关键词

Cancer; Cancer survivors; Fatigue; Psycho oncology; Post -traumatic growth

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study investigated the extent and longitudinal determinants of post-traumatic growth (PTG) in cancer survivors. The findings showed that the most PTG occurred in the subdimension of appreciation of life, while spiritual change was the least pronounced domain. Fatigue, pain, and emotional distress were predictors of long-term PTG.
Background/Objective: The aim was to investigate the extent and longitudinal determinants of post-traumatic growth (PTG) in cancer survivors. Methods: A sample of 1316 cancer survivors with various cancer types was examined using the EORTC QLQ-FA12 to assess fatigue, the EORTC QLQ-C30 pain items to assess pain and the Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ-4) to assess emotional distress two years after diagnosis (t0). Additionally, patients rated how well they felt informed about fatigue at t0. PTG was assessed with the 21-item PTG-Inventory four years after diagnosis (t1) comprising the five subdimensions appreciation of life, relation to others, personal strengths, new possibilities and spiritual change.Results: Regarding the extent of PTG, most positive developments were experienced in the PTG subdimension appreciation of life whereas the subdimension spiritual change was the least pronounced domain. Fatigue, pain and emotional distress were longitudinal but non-linear predictors of long-term PTG. Additionally, poor informedness about fatigue was associated with less PTG. Conclusions: PTG can be perceived even years after a traumatic cancer event and is longitudinally associated with common cancer side effects like fatigue, emotional distress and pain. Further research into the role of individuals' informedness contributing to PTG is needed.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据