4.7 Article

Synthesis and structure-activity relationship studies of fusidic acid derivatives as anti-inflammatory agents for acute lung injury

期刊

BIOORGANIC CHEMISTRY
卷 141, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ACADEMIC PRESS INC ELSEVIER SCIENCE
DOI: 10.1016/j.bioorg.2023.106885

关键词

Fusidic acid; Synthesis; Structure-activity relationships; Anti-inflammatory; MAPK/NF-kappa B; Bax/Bcl-2

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study designed a new anti-inflammatory compound, b2, which showed potential therapeutic effects on lung injury. In vitro and in vivo experiments demonstrated that b2 could attenuate pathological changes in ALI by inhibiting inflammatory factors and related signaling pathways.
Acute lung injury (ALI) are severe forms of diffuse lung disease that impose a substantial health burden all over the world. In the United States, approximately 190,000 cases per year of ALI each year, with an associated 74,500 deaths per year. Anti-inflammatory therapy has become a reasonable approach for the treatment of patients with ALI. In this study, fusidic acid derivatives were used to design new anti-inflammatory compounds with high pharmacological activity and low toxicity. A total of 30 new fusidic acid derivatives were discovered, synthesized, and screened for their anti-inflammatory activity against lipopolysaccharide (LPS)-treated RAW264.7 cells. Of them, b2 was found to be the most active, with a higher efficiency compared with fusidic acid and celecoxib in 10 mu M. In vitro, we further measured b2 inhibited inflammatory factor NO (IC50 = 5.382 +/- 0.655 mu M), IL-6 (IC50 = 7.767 +/- 0.871 mu M), and TNF-alpha (IC50 = 7.089 +/- 0.775 mu M) and b2 inhibited inflammatory cytokines COX-2 and iNOS, ROS production, NF-kappa B/MAPK and Bax/Bcl-2 signaling pathway pathway. In vivo, b2 attenuated ALI pathological changes and inhibited inflammatory cytokines COX-2 and iNOS in lung tissue and NF-kappa B/MAPK and Bax/Bcl-2 signaling pathway. In conclusion, b2 may be a promising anti-inflammatory lead compound.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据