4.3 Review

Functional drivers of resistance to anti-CD19 CAR-T cell therapy in diffuse large B cell lymphoma

期刊

LEUKEMIA & LYMPHOMA
卷 -, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD
DOI: 10.1080/10428194.2023.2258244

关键词

CAR-T; resistance; mechanisms; lymphoma

向作者/读者索取更多资源

CAR-19 therapy has shown impressive durable remissions for relapsed or refractory large B-cell lymphoma patients, but a significant proportion of patients still fail to respond or progress. Current research has focused on host clinical parameters, CAR-19 product composition, and tumor microenvironment alterations, with limited studies on genomic alterations in tumor cells.
Chimeric antigen receptor T-cell therapy targeting CD19 (CAR-19) promotes impressive durable remissions for relapsed or refractory (rel/ref) large B-cell lymphoma (LBCL) patients with historically poor prognoses. Despite this, over half of patients still fail to respond or eventually progress. Studies to reveal mechanisms of resistance have examined host clinical parameters, CAR-19 product composition, and tumor microenvironment (TME) alterations, while a relative paucity of studies has analyzed contributions by genomic alterations in tumor cells. Factors associated with outcome include increased tumor volume, specific characteristics of infused CAR-T products, infiltration by myeloid cells in tumor microenvironments, and markers of complexity in LBCL genomes. Functional laboratory studies of resistance are largely absent in the current literature, illustrating a need for experiments in genetically accurate immunocompetent systems to confirm candidate alterations' roles in resistance and inform future improvements. In this review, we highlight key studies that have elucidated biomarkers of resistance in hosts, CAR products, TMEs, and comparatively understudied tumor-intrinsic mediators encoded by tumor genomes. We conclude with an experimental framework suitable for CAR-19 resistance biomarker identification and laboratory functional validation.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据