4.7 Article

Cardio-Ankle Vascular Index and Aging: Differences between CAVI and CAVI0

期刊

JOURNAL OF CLINICAL MEDICINE
卷 12, 期 21, 页码 -

出版社

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/jcm12216726

关键词

arterial stiffness; arterial aging; CAVI; CAVI0; older adults

向作者/读者索取更多资源

CAVI and CAVI0 can describe arterial stiffness, with CAVI0 showing larger variations in the elderly population. The association between CAVI0 and diastolic blood pressure is modified by age, while the association between CAVI and diastolic blood pressure remains unchanged with age.
Background: Cardio-ankle vascular index (CAVI) and CAVI0 (a mathematical expression derived from CAVI, supposed to be less dependent on blood pressure), can describe arterial stiffness, considering a wide proportion of the arterial tree. The aim of this study was to examine the relationship between CAVI, CAVI0 and aging, looking at the differences between the two arterial stiffness indexes. Methods: A total of 191 patients (68 male, mean age 68.3 +/- 14.4 years) referred to the Geriatric Ward and Outpatient Clinic at Verona University Hospital were included and underwent a comprehensive clinical evaluation. CAVI and CAVI0 were obtained for each. Results: CAVI0 steeply rises in the elderly age strata, widening the gap between CAVI and CAVI0. An inverse relationship is evident between CAVI0 and DBP in older patients, and CAVI0 is shown to be dependent on age, DBP and age-DBP interaction (R2 = 0.508). Age modifies the effect of DBP on CAVI0, but not on CAVI. Conclusions: The real new findings of our study are that the association between CAVI0 and diastolic blood pressure (DBP) is modified by age, whereas the association between CAVI and DBP is not modified by age. From a clinical point of view, these are very important findings, as DBP decreases with aging, affecting in elderly populations the reliability of CAVI0, which strictly depends on DBP in the formula to calculate it. To monitor the effect of CV therapies, progression of CV diseases and to evaluate clinical outcomes in elderly populations, we suggest using CAVI and not CAVI0.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据