4.7 Article

Mettl3 induced miR-338-3p expression in dendritic cells promotes antigen-specific Th17 cell response via regulation of Dusp16

期刊

FASEB JOURNAL
卷 37, 期 11, 页码 -

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1096/fj.202300893R

关键词

dendritic cells; Dusp16; Mettl3; miR-338-3p; p38 signaling; Th17 cell

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study identifies the role of miR-338-3p in dendritic cells, showing that it enhances the activation of pathogenic Th17 cells and promotes the production of related cytokines. MiR-338-3p represses Dusp16 and strengthens the p38 signaling pathway, resulting in increased pathogenic Th17 responses. Additionally, the m6A methyltransferase Mettl3 mediates the upregulation of miR-338-3p in activated dendritic cells.
Pathogenic Th17 cells are critical drivers of multiple autoimmune diseases, including uveitis and its animal model, experimental autoimmune uveitis (EAU). However, how innate immune signals modulate pathogenic Th17 responses remains largely unknown. Here, we showed that miR-338-3p endowed dendritic cells (DCs) with an increased ability to activate interphotoreceptor retinoid-binding protein (IRBP)(1-20)-specific Th17 cells by promoting the production of IL-6, IL-1 beta, and IL-23. In vivo administration of LV-miR-338-infected DCs promoted pathogenic Th17 responses and exacerbated EAU development. Mechanistically, dual-specificity phosphatase 16 (Dusp16) was a molecular target of miR-338-3p. miR-338-3p repressed Dusp16 and therefore strengthened the mitogen-activated protein kinase (MAPK) p38 signaling, resulting in increased production of Th17-polarizing cytokines and subsequent pathogenic Th17 responses. In addition, methyltransferase like 3 (Mettl3), a key m6A methyltransferase, mediated the upregulation of miR-338-3p in activated DCs. Together, our findings identify a vital role for Mettl3/miR-338-3p/Dusp16/p38 signaling in DCs-driven pathogenic Th17 responses and suggest a potential therapeutic avenue for uveitis and other Th17 cell-related autoimmune disorders.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据