4.7 Article

Biodegradable poly(lactic acid) and polycaprolactone alternating multiblock copolymers with controllable mechanical properties

期刊

POLYMER DEGRADATION AND STABILITY
卷 218, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.polymdegradstab.2023.110564

关键词

Poly(lactic acid); Alternating multiblock copolymer; Biodegradable plastic; Toughness; Compost biodegradation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

As the environmental pollution caused by plastic waste and dependence on petroleum resources become more serious, the demand for biodegradable plastics and bioplastics is increasing. This study successfully improved the toughness and biodegradability of poly(lactic acid) (PLA) through copolymerization.
As the environmental pollution problems caused by plastic waste and the dependence on petroleum resources become more serious, the need for biodegradable plastics and bioplastics is increasing. Recently, poly(lactic acid) (PLA), one of the leading biodegradable plastics, has been widely used as a biomass plastic to replace petroleum-based materials. However, PLA is brittle and does not decompose easily in real environments, limiting its use. In this study, PLA was copolymerized with polycaprolactone (PCL) to obtain triblock copolymers PLA-PCL-PLA, and then chain-extended by hexamethylene diisocyanate to obtain PLA-PCL alternating multiblock copolymers based on PLA. By varying the chain lengths of PLA in the alternating multiblock copolymers, the mechanical properties could be easily controlled, and the toughness was significantly improved compared to PLA-PCL random co-polymers. Evaluation of biodegradability in compost showed improved CO2 production and biodegradation rate in the initial stage of the test, suggesting high biodegradability. The change in molecular weight of the copolymer films in seawater did not prove marine biodegradability, but it was assumed that the copolymer's regularly arranged structure and low Tg contributed to its low molecular weight, one of the key factors in PLA biodegradation.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据