4.7 Article

Exploring the impact of fouling on permeate flux and quality in ceramic ultrafiltration after treating poultry wastewater, and strategies for effective modelling and mitigation

期刊

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.jwpe.2023.104348

关键词

Wastewater; Ultrafiltration; Ceramic membrane; Fouling; Cake formation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Ultrafiltration is an effective method for treating wastewater from the poultry processing industry, improving water quality for recycling. Increasing transmembrane pressure enhances permeate quality and cleaning with acid and base restores initial permeate flux. The process efficiently removes particles, chemical oxygen demand, and phosphorus from the wastewater.
Ultrafiltration was used to treat the poultry processing industry's wastewater to enhance the water quality, making it suitable for recycling within the process. With the application of a constant transmembrane pressure for the ultrafiltration process, the permeate flux decreased over time, while the permeate quality improved. Mathematical modelling of the flux data and permeate analysis revealed that cake layer formation was responsible for fouling but with some initial pore blocking. The study indicated that higher transmembrane pressure contributed to the formation and compression of the cake layer, resulting in improved permeate quality. Cleaning with water failed to eliminate fouling, but chemical cleaning with acid and base helped to restore the initial permeate flux. The process effectively removed almost all particles (>99 % reduction of turbidity), over 90 % of the chemical oxygen demand, and 40-80 % of total phosphorus. The efficiency of the phosphorus removal was lower for pre-treated wastewater as part of the phosphorus was already removed. Increasing the pressure from 1 to 3 bar significantly improved the removal of chemical oxygen demand, total phosphorus, and lipids by 10 % without negatively impacting the membrane-cleaning process.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据