4.6 Article

Higher-risk SIPAT score predicts increased risk of long-term mortality in orthotopic heart transplant recipients

期刊

INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CARDIOLOGY
卷 393, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER IRELAND LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijcard.2023.131360

关键词

Orthotopic heart transplantation (OHT); Psychosocial; Survival; Equity

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The study found that the SIPAT score of high-risk patients before heart transplantation is associated with a reduced long-term survival rate post-transplant.
Background: Orthotopic heart transplantation (OHT) improves survival in eligible patients. Organ scarcity necessitates extensive clinical and psychosocial evaluations before listing. The Stanford Integrated Psychosocial Assessment for Transplant (SIPAT) predicts risk for poor psychosocial outcomes and morbidity in the first year post-transplant, yet it is unknown whether it predicts long-term outcomes.Methods: Blinded examiners obtained data from a retrospective cohort of 51 OHT recipients from a high-volume center. Patients with Excellent or Good SIPAT score indicating low psychosocial risk for transplant (E/G) were compared with those who met Minimum Acceptable Criteria or were High Risk (MAC/HR). Associations were examined between SIPAT group and outcomes.Results: MAC/HR versus E/G recipients had significantly reduced survival in the 10 years post-OHT (mean 6.7 vs 8.8 years, p = 0.027; 55% vs 82% survival proportions, p = 0.037). MAC/HR patients were more likely to live in a county with greater income inequality (p = 0.025) and have psychiatric history pre-OHT (p = 0.046). Both groups had otherwise similar demographics and medical history. A lower proportion of MAC/HR patients adhered to medications post-OHT and a greater proportion had psychiatric illness, though differences were not significant.Conclusions: Higher-risk SIPAT scores predict reduced long-term survival post-OHT. Further efforts are crucial to improve outcomes in higher-risk patients.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据