4.5 Article

IrO2 deposited on RuO2 as core-shell structured RuO2@IrO2 for oxygen evolution reaction in electrochemical water electrolyzer

期刊

MOLECULAR CATALYSIS
卷 551, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.mcat.2023.113619

关键词

Electrochemical water splitting; Oxygen evolution reaction; Activity; Stability; RuO2@IrO2

向作者/读者索取更多资源

RuO2@IrO2 catalyst was synthesized and applied in electrochemical water splitting for hydrogen production. The catalyst showed high activity and stability, with optimized RuO2@IrO2-20 performing the best in terms of mass activity and overpotential.
The ever-rising energy demand and environmental concerns require the application of electrochemical water splitting to produce hydrogen as a substitute energy to fossil fuel. Proton exchange membrane water electrolyzers split water into oxygen and hydrogen at the anode and cathode, respectively. Anode catalysts necessitate extensive study, because significant overpotential is required to accelerate the 4-e sluggish oxygen evolution reaction in acidic media. RuO2@IrO2 was synthesized in this work, which aims to achieve high activity and stability. In doing so, RuO2 center dot xH2O was first prepared using the Adams method, followed by the subsequent precipitation of Ir(OH)3 on its surface via the hydrolysis of iridium precursor in a mix of NH3 center dot H2O in ethanol. Upon heat treatment, RuO2@IrO2 with an appropriate Ru/Ir molar ratio was obtained and applied for oxygen evolution reaction. Electrochemical evaluation results show that the optimized RuO2@IrO2-20 performed the best in terms of enhanced mass activity (1.62 A mg 1oxide @1.6 V) and lower overpotential (275 mV@10 mA cm-2) compared with single RuO2 and IrO2 catalysts. In addition, both chronopotentiometry and chronoamperometry test results show that the stability of RuO2@IrO2-20 is highly competitive. The intimate contact between RuO2 and IrO2 combines both the most active RuO2 and stable IrO2 as an integrated catalyst.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据