4.7 Article

The flexibility of virtual energy storage based on the thermal inertia of buildings in renewable energy communities: A techno-economic analysis and comparison with the electric battery solution

期刊

JOURNAL OF ENERGY STORAGE
卷 73, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.est.2023.109083

关键词

Sector coupling; Heat pumps; Renewable energy community; Energy storage; Flexibility; Building thermal inertia

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This paper analyzes the flexible use of heat pumps for building heating in the context of the Renewable Energy Community (REC). Using the flexibility of energy conversion and heat pumps, the paper demonstrates that the self-consumption of REC can be significantly increased. The virtual energy storage solution based on buildings is found to be more economically advantageous compared to traditional centralized electric battery storage system.
The Renewable Energy Community (REC) concept has been introduced into the European decarbonization guidelines to promote the utilization of Renewable Energy Sources (RES) and to incentivize their selfconsumption at the local level. This paper analyzes the flexible use of Heat Pumps (HP) for building heating in an REC context. The Power-to-Heat (P2H) energy conversion process of HP allows the flexibility of the thermal sector to be exploited within the electricity sector: in this way, it is possible to store energy in the form of heat inside the building mass and then use the stored energy to reduce the building heating demand in the hours following the accumulation of energy. This energy storage solution has been defined as building-based Virtual Energy Storage (VES). The flexibility enabled by VES has been used to optimize the self-consumption of an REC. The flexible VES solution was evaluated, from a technical and economic point of view, through a sensitivity analysis on the variation of the RES penetration, and the results were compared with those based on a more traditional centralized electric battery (EB) storage system. The results demonstrated that the VES solution is less flexible than electric batteries. Nevertheless, both flexible solutions (VES and EB) can significantly increase the REC self-consumption: the self-consumed energy increased by between 6% and 44% thanks to the exploitation of the VES flexibility, while the EB flexibility enabled an increase in the self-consumed energy of 19% to 63% according to the scenario analyzed. However, due to the high investment cost of EB, the VES configuration resulted to be the best solution from an economic point of view.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据