4.6 Article

Carbonized polyacrylonitrile array as a sensitive, biocompatible, and durable substrate for surface-enhanced Raman spectroscopy

期刊

ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE-NANO
卷 -, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ROYAL SOC CHEMISTRY
DOI: 10.1039/d3en00404j

关键词

-

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Surface-enhanced Raman spectroscopy (SERS) is a widely used analytical technique with successful applications in many fields. However, there are still challenges to be addressed before SERS substrates can be applied in practical systems, including poor repeatability, uniformity, biocompatibility, and durability. To overcome these challenges, a carbonized polyacrylonitrile array is designed and synthesized, serving as a highly sensitive and biocompatible SERS substrate with excellent signal enhancement, reproducibility, and durability.
Surface-enhanced Raman spectroscopy (SERS), which uses surface-sensitive resonances, is an extension of Raman spectroscopy. The SERS method has rapidly emerged as one of the leading analytical techniques with successful applications in many fields. In spite of this, there are still some obstacles that must be overcome before SERS substrates are applied to practical systems, including poor repeatability, uniformity, biocompatibility, and durability. To overcome all these problems, we demonstrate the design, synthesis, and use of a carbonized polyacrylonitrile array as a highly sensitive substrate for the development of biocompatible, consistent, uniform, and durable SERS. Additionally, because of its potent wideband charge-transfer resonance, it offers excellent signal enhancement (105), as well as extraordinary high reproducibility by eliminating hot spots, high biocompatibility, and high durability on account of its oxidation resistance. A carbonized PAN array was designed and applied as an effective SERS substrate. It provided a significant signal enhancement (& SIM;105) with its strong broadband charge-transfer resonance and high reproducibility and consistency in the SERS spectrum.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据