4.3 Article

Dermal tissue penetration of in-plane silicon microneedles evaluated in skin-simulating hydrogel, rat skin and porcine skin

期刊

BIOMATERIALS ADVANCES
卷 155, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.bioadv.2023.213659

关键词

Microneedles; Transdermal drug delivery; Intradermal sensing; Skin penetration; Skin-simulating hydrogel

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Microneedle-based sensors have been introduced as a novel strategy for in situ monitoring of biomarkers in the skin. In this study, silicon microneedles with different dimensions and shapes were evaluated for their ability to penetrate the skin. It was found that triangular microneedles require the lowest force for skin penetration.
Recently, microneedle-based sensors have been introduced as novel strategy for in situ monitoring of biomarkers in the skin. Here, in-plane silicon microneedles with different dimensions and shapes are fabricated and their ability to penetrate skin is evaluated. Arrays with flat, triangular, hypodermic, lancet and pencil-shaped microneedles, with lengths of 500-1000 mu m, widths of 200-400 mu m and thickness of 180-500 mu m are considered. Fracture force is higher than 20 N for all microneedle arrays (MNA) confirming a high mechanical stability of the microneedles. Penetration force in skin-simulating hydrogels, excised rat abdominal skin and porcine ear skin is at least five times lower than the fracture force for all MNA designs. The lowest force for skin penetration is required for triangular microneedles with a low width and thickness. Skin tissue staining and histological analysis of rat abdominal skin and porcine ear skin confirm successful penetration of the epidermis for all MNA designs. However, the penetration depth is between 100 and 300 mu m, which is considerably lower than the microneedle length. Tissue damage estimated by visual analysis of the penetration hole is smallest for triangular microneedles. Penetration ability and tissue damage are compared to the skin prick test (SPT) needle applied in allergy testing.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据