3.8 Proceedings Paper

Effect of pH and gel electrolyte on safe charge injection and electrode degradation of platinum electrodes

期刊

出版社

IEEE
DOI: 10.1109/BioSensors58001.2023.10280965

关键词

platinum dissolution; damage mechanisms; charge injection mechanisms; pH electrochemistry; gel electrolyte

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Platinum is a commonly used electrode material for neural interfaces and electrochemical biosensors, but it can undergo faradaic reactions that lead to platinum dissolution and tissue damage. This study investigates the influence of electrolyte on platinum dissolution mechanisms and demonstrates the importance of carefully selecting stimulation protocols and electrolytes to avoid platinum dissolution and tissue damage.
Platinum (Pt) is a widespread electrode material choice for neural interfaces and electrochemical biosensors, due to its supposed electrochemical inertness. However, faradaic reactions can take place at Pt electrodes, including Pt oxide formation and reduction. Repeated redox cycles of Pt can lead to Pt dissolution, which may harm the tissue and significantly reduce electrode lifetime. In this study, we investigated how the electrolyte may influence Pt dissolution mechanisms during current pulsing. Two electrolyte characteristics were considered: pH and gelation. We confirmed that empirically reported tissue damage thresholds correlate with Pt oxide formation and reduction. Varying electrolyte pH occasioned a shift in recorded potentials, however, damage thresholds correlated with the same mechanisms for all pH values. The similar behaviour observed for pH values in the central range (4 <= pH <= 10) can be explained by variations of local pH at the electrode surface. Gel electrolytes behaved comparably to solutions, which was confirmed by statistical similarity tests. This study extends the knowledge about platinum electrochemistry and shows the necessity to carefully choose the stimulation protocol and the electrolyte to avoid platinum dissolution and tissue damage.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

3.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据