4.7 Article

Training and external validation of pre-treatment FDG PET-CT-based models for outcome prediction in anal squamous cell carcinoma

期刊

EUROPEAN RADIOLOGY
卷 -, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s00330-023-10340-9

关键词

Squamous cell carcinoma; Anal canal; Positron emission tomography computed tomography; Event-free survival

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The study aimed to develop and test predictive models for progression-free survival and overall survival in patients with anal squamous cell carcinoma. The results showed that a model based on patient age and metabolic tumor volume had good predictive potential for survival.
ObjectivesThe incidence of anal squamous cell carcinoma (ASCC) is increasing worldwide, with a significant proportion of patients treated with curative intent having recurrence. The ability to accurately predict progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) would allow for development of personalised treatment strategies. The aim of the study was to train and external test radiomic/clinical feature derived time-to-event prediction models.MethodsConsecutive patients with ASCC treated with curative intent at two large tertiary referral centres with baseline FDG PET-CT were included. Radiomic feature extraction was performed using LIFEx software on the pre-treatment PET-CT. Two distinct predictive models for PFS and OS were trained and tuned at each of the centres, with the best performing models externally tested on the other centres' patient cohort.ResultsA total of 187 patients were included from centre 1 (mean age 61.6 +/- 11.5 years, median follow up 30 months, PFS events = 57/187, OS events = 46/187) and 257 patients were included from centre 2 (mean age 62.6 +/- 12.3 years, median follow up 35 months, PFS events = 70/257, OS events = 54/257). The best performing model for PFS and OS was achieved using a Cox regression model based on age and metabolic tumour volume (MTV) with a training c-index of 0.7 and an external testing c-index of 0.7 (standard error = 0.4).ConclusionsA combination of patient age and MTV has been demonstrated using external validation to have the potential to predict OS and PFS in ASCC patients.Clinical relevance statementA Cox regression model using patients' age and metabolic tumour volume showed good predictive potential for progression-free survival in external testing. The benefits of a previous radiomics model published by our group could not be confirmed on external testing.Key Points center dot A predictive model based on patient age and metabolic tumour volume showed potential to predict overall survival and progression-free survival and was validated on an external test cohort.center dot The methodology used to create a predictive model from age and metabolic tumour volume was repeatable using external cohort data.center dot The predictive ability of positron emission tomography-computed tomography-derived radiomic features diminished when the influence of metabolic tumour volume was accounted for.Key Points center dot A predictive model based on patient age and metabolic tumour volume showed potential to predict overall survival and progression-free survival and was validated on an external test cohort.center dot The methodology used to create a predictive model from age and metabolic tumour volume was repeatable using external cohort data.center dot The predictive ability of positron emission tomography-computed tomography-derived radiomic features diminished when the influence of metabolic tumour volume was accounted for.Key Points center dot A predictive model based on patient age and metabolic tumour volume showed potential to predict overall survival and progression-free survival and was validated on an external test cohort.center dot The methodology used to create a predictive model from age and metabolic tumour volume was repeatable using external cohort data.center dot The predictive ability of positron emission tomography-computed tomography-derived radiomic features diminished when the influence of metabolic tumour volume was accounted for.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据