4.6 Article

Soft aggregates formed by a nonionic phytosterol ethoxylate and β-cyclodextrin in aqueous solution

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.colsurfa.2015.03.062

关键词

Phytosterol ethoxylate surfactant; beta-Cyclodextrin; Self-assembling; H-1-H-1 NOESY

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [20973104, 21373127, 21403294]
  2. Specialized Research Fund for the Doctoral Program of Higher Education [20130131110010]
  3. SAXS station with Beijing Synchrotron Radiation Facility (BSRF) in China

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The self-assembling behavior of a nonionic phytosterol ethoxylate surfactant (BPS-30), mixed with beta-cyclodextrin (beta-CD) at a 1:1 molar ratio, has been investigated in aqueous solutions. The anisotropic and birefringent aggregates obtained with the mixtures present vesicle and lamellar morphologies, which are rarely found in other surfactant/beta-CD mixture systems. The observed aggregate morphologies are determined mainly by the surfactant concentrations as evidenced through observations using scanning or cryo-transmission electron microscopy. The vesicle aggregates appear in solutions of low BPS-30 concentrations (<12 wt%), while the lamellar structures are observed in solutions of high BPS-30 concentrations (>12 wt%). Additional aggregate structural details are explored through small-angle X-ray scattering measurements. Different with other surfactant/beta-CD mixture systems, beta-CD appears to function as a cosurfactant in this research, as shown by the H-1-H-1 NOESY nuclear magnetic resonance spectroscopy and the surface tension measurements. Control experiments with urea molecules were conducted to demonstrate that the main driving force of aggregation is a synergistic effect of the H-bonding and hydrophobic interactions. The obtained results on the nonionic mixture of biosurfactant/beta-CD in this paper further demonstrate the potential expanded applications of soft matter construction. (C) 2015 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据