3.8 Article

Hydrogen and oxygen evolution reactions on single atom catalysts stabilized by a covalent organic framework

期刊

ENERGY ADVANCES
卷 2, 期 7, 页码 1022-1029

出版社

ROYAL SOC CHEMISTRY
DOI: 10.1039/d3ya00162h

关键词

-

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Single Atom Catalysts (SACs) bridge the gap between homogenous and heterogenous catalysis and show promise in various chemical reactions, including water splitting. This study focuses on SACs embedded in Covalent Organic Frameworks (COFs) and investigates their reactivity in Hydrogen and Oxygen Evolution Reactions (HER and OER, respectively) using density functional theory (DFT). The results reveal the formation of unique intermediates and shed light on the reaction mechanism, providing valuable insights for the design of novel catalytic materials.
Single Atom Catalysts (SACs) bridge homo- and heterogenous catalysis and are promising for several chemical processes of interest, including water splitting. SACs can form reaction adducts that do not likely form on conventional metal catalysts. Besides the typical supporting matrices made by carbon-based materials, Covalent Organic Frameworks (COFs) are gaining attention because of the possibility to design the hosting cavity to stably bind the active metal site. We performed a density functional theory (DFT) study of a set of SACs made by transition metal atoms embedded in a recently synthesized COF material. We explored their reactivity in Hydrogen and Oxygen Evolution Reactions (HER and OER, respectively). SACs@COF can form several intermediates with no counterpart on the classical metal electrodes, with important implications on the reaction mechanism. The results are useful for the design of novel catalytic materials and for the identification of interpretative/predictive activity descriptors. Catalytic activity for HER and OER of SAC made by TM atoms embedded in COF were investigated. They often form stable unconventional intermediates, and these species can be more stable than classical HER and OER adducts.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

3.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据