3.8 Proceedings Paper

Bottom-up Neurogenic-inspired Computational Model

期刊

出版社

IEEE
DOI: 10.1109/BioSensors58001.2023.10280794

关键词

Large-scale biosensor; oscillatory neural network; supervised-Hebbian learning; posedness

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In this study, we use computational methods to explore the role of the dentate gyrus (DG) in the hippocampus, specifically its contributions to neurogenesis in adulthood and its involvement in learning and memory. We introduce a novel computational model, the MLP-ONN, which incorporates biologically accurate features of the hippocampal-entorhinal cortical network. This model utilizes empirical data from large-scale simultaneous recordings to enhance spatiotemporal resolution. The findings shed light on the implications of newly generated neurons in the adult DG network and their broader functional and computational impacts.
In this study, we explore computationally the role of the dentate gyrus (DG) in the hippocampus, particularly its significant contribution to the neurogenic process in the adult brain and its role in learning and memory. We introduce a novel computational model, a feedforward multi-layer perceptron oscillatory neural network (MLP-ONN), that incorporates biologically accurate features of the hippocampal-entorhinal cortical network (i.e., DG, CA3, EC). This model leverages empirical data gathered from large-scale simultaneous recordings using a high-density 4096-microelectrode sensing array, providing exceptional spatiotemporal resolution. Unlike previous models, ours considers a dynamically varying DG network size, sparse non-linear oscillatory input patterns, and a dynamic supervised-Hebbian learning rule. We suggest that the incorporation of increasing firing units within the DG layer, with specific levels of sparsity, enhances the well-posedness of our model. This work marks a significant leap in understanding the implications of newly generated neurons in the adult DG network and their broad functional and computational impacts.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

3.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据