4.2 Article

Cloning and expression analysis of Mildew Locus O (MLO) genes related to powdery mildew resistance in Vitis pseudoreticulata, and functional characterisation of VpMLO13

出版社

TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD
DOI: 10.1080/01140671.2023.2280185

关键词

Disease resistance; Mildew Locus O (MLO); expression analysis; functional analysis; Vitis pseudoreticulata

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Mildew Locus O (MLO) genes facilitate infection by pathogens, including the causative agent of powdery mildew (PM) in grapevines. This study cloned and analyzed MLO genes associated with PM susceptibility, providing a basis for further investigating PM resistance mechanisms.
In many plants, Mildew Locus O (MLO) genes facilitate infection by pathogens, including Erysiphe necator, the causative agent of powdery mildew (PM) in grapevines. The function of VvMLOs in Vitis vinifera has previously been demonstrated, but the identity and function of VpMLOs in V. pseudoreticulata are not yet clear. Here, we cloned MLO genes that have been implicated in PM susceptibility from the highly PM-resistant V. pseudoreticulata accession 'Baihe-35-1' and the PM-susceptible V. vinifera 'Carinena'. The open reading frames (ORFs) of MLO3, MLO6, and MLO8 differed between 'Baihe-35-1' and 'Carinena'. After inoculation of the leaves with Erysiphe necator, six MLO genes exhibited two distinct expression patterns in 'Baihe-35-1' and 'Carinena'. Consistent with the MLO proteins in other plants, we also found that VpMLO3, VpMLO6, VpMLO11, and VpMLO13 are all localised to the plasma membrane. To further support a role for VpMLOs in susceptibility to PM, we expressed VpMlo13 in the PM-resistant Arabidopsis thaliana MLO2/6/12 triple mutant, which showed that transgenic expression of VpMLO13 restored susceptibility to PM. In addition, a yeast two-hybrid (Y2H) assay showed that VpMLO13 interacted with calmodulin (VpCaM). These results will provide a basis for further investigating the PM resistance mechanisms in V. pseudoreticulata.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.2
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据