4.5 Article

Using lithic assemblage formation to approach Middle Palaeolithic settlement dynamics: El Salt Stratigraphic Unit X (Alicante, Spain)

期刊

ARCHAEOLOGICAL AND ANTHROPOLOGICAL SCIENCES
卷 9, 期 8, 页码 1715-1743

出版社

SPRINGER HEIDELBERG
DOI: 10.1007/s12520-016-0318-z

关键词

Middle Palaeolithic; Neanderthals; El Salt; Settlement dynamics; Palimpsest; Lithic assemblage formation

资金

  1. Spanish Government project 'La Desaparicion de los grupos neandertales en la region central del Mediterroneo Iberico. Una propuesta metodologica de aproximacion al proceso historico y al marco paleoambiental' [HAR2012-32703]
  2. Direccio General de Cultura (Conselleria de Educacio, Cultura i Esports. Generalitat Valenciana)
  3. Alcoy Archaeological Museum
  4. Town Hall of Alcoy

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The superposition of anthropogenic remains usually results in archaeological palimpsests, hindering an accurate characterization of the behavior underlying such remains. Aimed at facing this methodological constraint in the study of Palaeolithic contexts, we present a contextual approach to Neanderthal settlement dynamics based on an understanding of lithic assemblage formation processes. We focused on a set of lithic artifacts from the Middle Palaeolithic site of El Salt. With the goal of isolating temporally constrained units of behavioral analysis, we analyzed the spatial distribution of lithic, faunal and combustion remains. Then, the lithic records from each of the resulting units were analyzed from a genetic and technical perspective. This goal was achieved by identifying lithic Raw Material Units (RMU) through observations on reduction processes, refits and their spatial distribution. Our results suggest that El Salt SU X lithic remains represent several diachronic human occupation episodes and different site functions. This study illustrates the benefit of investigating lithic assemblage formation processes to alleviate the palimpsest problem in Palaeolithic contexts.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据