4.6 Article

Pathologist Computer-Aided Diagnostic Scoring of Tumor Cell Fraction: A Swiss National Study

期刊

MODERN PATHOLOGY
卷 36, 期 12, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.modpat.2023.100335

关键词

computer-aided diagnostic tool; digital pathology; interobserver variability; tumor cell fraction; artificial intelligence; pathology

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Estimating tumor cell fraction (TCF) is a common clinical task with high variability among pathologists. This study evaluated the impact of using a tumor cell fraction computer-aided diagnostic (TCFCAD) tool to support pathologists' evaluation. The results showed that with the assistance of TCFCAD, interobserver variability decreased and estimates were closer to the ground truth. Pathologists also reported increased confidence in their assessments when aided by the TCFCAD tool.
Tumor cell fraction (TCF) estimation is a common clinical task with well-established large interobserver variability. It thus provides an ideal test bed to evaluate potential impacts of employing a tumor cell fraction computer-aided diagnostic (TCFCAD) tool to support pathologists' evaluation. During a National Slide Seminar event, pathologists (n = 69) were asked to visually estimate TCF in 10 regions of interest (ROIs) from hematoxylin and eosin colorectal cancer images intentionally curated for diverse tissue compositions, cellularity, and stain intensities. Next, they re-evaluated the same ROIs while being provided a TCFCAD-created overlay highlighting predicted tumor vs nontumor cells, together with the corresponding TCF percentage. Participants also reported confidence levels in their assessments using a 5-tier scale, indicating no confidence to high confidence, respectively. The TCF ground truth (GT) was defined by manual cell-counting by experts. When assisted, interobserver variability significantly decreased, showing estimates converging to the GT. This improvement remained even when TCFCAD predictions deviated slightly from the GT. The standard deviation (SD) of the estimated TCF to the GT across ROIs was 9.9% vs 5.8% with TCFCAD (P < .0001). The intraclass correlation coefficient increased from 0.8 to 0.93 (95% CI, 0.65-0.93 vs 0.86-0.98), and pathologists stated feeling more confident when aided (3.67 +/- 0.81 vs 4.17 +/- 0.82 with the computer-aided diagnostic [CAD] tool). TCFCAD estimation support demonstrated improved scoring accuracy, interpathologist agreement, and scoring confidence. Interestingly, pathologists also expressed more willingness to use such a CAD tool at the end of the survey, highlighting the importance of training/education to increase adoption of CAD systems.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据