4.5 Article

Ketamine retards recovery from reward downshift and supports conditioned taste aversion

期刊

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.pbb.2023.173671

关键词

Reward downshift; Conditioned taste aversion; Ketamine; Frustration; Memory; Motivational summation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study investigated the behavioral effects of ketamine in animals and found that it increased consummatory suppression and induced conditioned taste aversion to sucrose.
Ketamine is a noncompetitive N-methyl-D-aspartate (NMDA) receptor antagonist with antidepressant, anxiolytic, and memory effects in clinical and preclinical studies. The present studies investigated the behavioral effects of ketamine in animals exposed to a consummatory successive negative contrast (cSNC) task involving unexpected reward downshift, negative emotion (frustration), and aversive memory. Food-restricted male rats had 5-min access to 32 % sucrose in each of 10 preshift sessions followed by 4 % sucrose in 4 postshift sessions. Unshif-ted controls had access to 4 % sucrose during all 14 sessions. Ketamine (10 mg/kg, ip) was injected 30 min before sessions 11 and 12 (Experiment 1) or immediately after session 11 (Experiment 3). The results showed that both pre-and postdownshift session injection of ketamine increased consummatory suppression, as Group 32-4/Ket exhibited lower sucrose intake than Groups 32-4/Sal, 4-4/Ket, and 4-4/Sal. These effects extended beyond the day(s) of injection. Experiments 2 and 4 showed that the same dose, route of administration, and time of in-jection induced significant conditioned taste aversion to 4 % sucrose, in the absence of reward downshift. These data suggest that ketamine induces an aversive state that may summate with frustration induced by reward downshift in the cSNC task and also support a conditioned taste aversion to 4 % sucrose in the absence of reward downshift. Implications for these and other experiments involving pre-and postsession administration of keta-mine are discussed.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据