4.7 Article

Enhanced fatigue life of additively manufactured high-strength TiB2-reinforced Al-Cu-Mg-Ag composite through in-process surface modification during hybrid laser processing

期刊

VIRTUAL AND PHYSICAL PROTOTYPING
卷 18, 期 1, 页码 -

出版社

TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD
DOI: 10.1080/17452759.2023.2276247

关键词

Hybrid manufacturing; laser powder bed fusion; surface roughness; fatigue; aluminium-based metal matrix composite

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This paper investigates the impact of applying a hybrid laser processing technique on the surface modification of aluminum-based composite materials in the laser powder bed fusion process. The significantly improved fatigue performance of the modified composite parts is attributed to the substantial reduction in surface roughness and stress concentration factor.
Laser powder bed fusion (L-PBF), an additive manufacturing (AM) technique, often leads to parts with high surface roughness in as-built condition, hence limited fatigue performance. This paper showcases the favourable impact of applying an in-process surface modification, adopting a hybrid laser processing technique (dual-laser PBF (dL-PBF)), on the three-point bending fatigue life of TiB2-reinforced Al-Cu-Mg-Ag composite coupons. The dL-PBF process parameters are optimised for this high-strength aluminium-based metal matrix composite, followed by a comparative study between 3 surface conditions, i.e. as-built, dL-PBF processed, and milled, focusing on surface roughness, concomitant stress concentration factor, surface residual stress, sub-surface hardness, sub-surface microstructure, and fatigue performance. While no significant hardness or microstructural differences are found, surface roughness and stress concentration factor are substantially decreased (> 50%) and identified as the primary factors for the significantly enhanced fatigue performance of dL-PBF processed TiB2-reinforced Al-Cu-Mg-Ag composite parts with up-facing inclined surfaces.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据