4.3 Article

Liposomal irinotecan plus fluorouracil/leucovorin in older patients with advanced pancreatic cancer: a single-center retrospective study

期刊

出版社

SPRINGER JAPAN KK
DOI: 10.1007/s10147-023-02432-9

关键词

Liposomal irinotecan; Fluorouracil/leucovorin; Aging; Pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma; Second-line treatment; NAPOLI-1 trial

类别

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The efficacy and safety of nal-IRI + 5-FU/LV for patients with PDAC are not significantly different for those aged >= 70 years compared to younger patients.
Background The global phase 3 NAPOLI -1 trial of patients with pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) demonstrated an overall survival (OS) benefit from using liposomal irinotecan and 5-fluorouracil/leucovorin (nal-IRI + 5-FU/LV) after treatment with gemcitabine (GEM) compared to 5-FU/LV alone. However, the efficacy and safety of this regimen in older patients are not well studied.Methods We conducted a single-center retrospective study to compare the therapeutic efficacy of nal-IRI + 5-FU/LV between older and younger patients with cutoff ages of 70 and 75 years, respectively. We included patients with a prior history of one or more GEM-based regimens for locally advanced or metastatic PDAC and were treated with nal-IRI + 5-FU/LV.Results Of the 115 patients, 54 (47.0%) and 24 (20.9%) were aged >= 70 and >= 75 years, respectively. The median OS and progression-free survival (PFS) of the entire cohort were 8.5 and 3.6 months, respectively. No significant differences were observed in OS and PFS hazard ratios using age cutoffs of 70 (P = 0.90 and 0.99, respectively) and 75 (P = 0.90 and 0.76, respectively) years. Additionally, no significant differences were found in the incidence of treatment-related adverse events (trAEs) between patients aged >= 70 and < 70 years or those aged >= 75 and < 75 years. Other than hematological toxicity, no trAEs higher than Grade 4 were observed in either age group.Conclusion The efficacy and safety of nal-IRI + 5-FU/LV for patients with PDAC are not significantly different for those aged >= 70 years compared to younger patients.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据