4.6 Article

Effect of different modified lignins on the properties of xylan composite hydrogels

期刊

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/app.54910

关键词

antioxidation performance; hemicellulose composite hydrogel; modified lignin; swelling properties

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In this study, a hemicellulose composite hydrogel with adjustable mechanical properties and high swelling ratio was successfully prepared by using modified lignin as a reinforcing agent. The modified lignin significantly improved the mechanical properties and swelling ratio of the composite hydrogel. The addition of modified lignin greatly increased the swelling ratio of the hydrogel and exhibited excellent antioxidant properties.
To improve the mechanical properties of hemicellulose hydrogel, a green, adjustable mechanical property, high swelling ratio (SR) composite hydrogel was successfully prepared by using modified lignin as a reinforcing agent. The structure and characteristics of the composite hydrogels were investigated by TGA, FTIR, SEM, rheological analysis, and SR. It can be found that the modified lignin could significantly improve the mechanical properties of the composite hydrogels. The maximum compressive stress of unmodified lignin hydrogel was 61.72 kPa and the compressive deformation was 75%. Compared with the unmodified lignin hydrogel, the mechanical properties were significantly improved, with the maximum compressive stress of the modified lignin hydrogel was 145.2 kPa and the compressive deformation was up to 90%. After adding modified lignin, the SR of the as-prepared hydrogel was up to 155.17 g/g, which was much higher than that of unmodified lignin hydrogel (105.79 g/g). The composite hydrogel had good antioxidant properties, and the free radical removal rate can reach 85.3%, which is twice as much as that without the modified lignin. With cost-effective lignin as a reinforcing agent, the as-prepared hemicellulose hydrogel with adjustable mechanical properties is favorable for great application potential.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据