4.7 Article

Direct recycling for advancing sustainable battery solutions

期刊

MATERIALS TODAY ENERGY
卷 38, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.mtener.2023.101434

关键词

Lithium-ion battery; Solid-state battery; Dry electrode manufacturing; Sustainability; Cathodes

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This article introduces the application of direct recycling methods in conventional lithium-ion batteries and all-solid-state batteries, and discusses the potential of dry manufacturing methods in direct recycling.
Lithium-ion batteries (LIBs) have undergone extensive production to meet the escalating demand for sustainable energy solutions in consumer electronics, renewable energy integration, and electric trans-portation. Nonetheless, the accumulation of spent LIBs at their end-of-life stage has raised concerns regarding their environmental impact and the sustainability of manufacturing processes. To address these issues, battery recycling has emerged as a promising solution, offering both environmental safe-guarding and the advancements in manufacturing sustainability. In contrast to traditional recycling methods involving high-temperature smelting and acid-leaching, direct recycling has gained prominence due to its economic viability and environmental benefits. This comprehensive review focuses on the current landscape of the direct recycling methods applied to conventional LIBs. Furthermore, this review discusses advancements in the direct recycling methods tailored explicitly for all-solid-state batteries. The exploration extends to dry manufacturing approaches, which have shown potential in the realm of direct recycling. Finally, the review presents a forward-looking perspective to outline impending chal-lenges and avenues for research to fully realize direct recycling for LIBs/all-solid-state batteries. This trajectory ensures a more sustainable and ecologically amicable approach to battery production and waste management.(c) 2023 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据