4.8 Article

HSPA8 Activates Wnt/β-Catenin Signaling to Facilitate BRAF V600E Colorectal Cancer Progression by CMA-Mediated CAV1 Degradation

期刊

ADVANCED SCIENCE
卷 -, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/advs.202306535

关键词

BRAF V600E; drug resistance; epithelial-mesenchymal transition; heat shock 70 kDa protein 8; Wnt/beta-catenin

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The heat shock 70 kDa protein 8 (HSPA8) is identified as an important regulator in the development of refractory BRAF V600E colorectal cancer (CRC), promoting the activation of the Wnt/beta-catenin signaling pathway and contributing to cancer metastasis and progression. HSPA8 may serve as a predictive biomarker and therapeutic target in clinical practice.
BRAF V600E attracts wide attention in the treatment of colorectal cancer (CRC) as stratifying and predicting a refractory classification of CRC. Recent evidence indicates that Wnt/beta-catenin signaling is broadly activated and participates in the refractoriness of BRAF V600E CRC, but the underlying molecular mechanism needs to be elucidated. Here, heat shock 70 kDa protein 8 (HSPA8), an essential regulator in chaperone-mediated autophagy (CMA), is identified as a potential therapeutic target for advanced BRAF V600E CRC. These results show that HSPA8 is transcriptionally upregulated in BRAF V600E CRC, which promotes CMA-dependent degradation of caveolin-1 (CAV1) to release beta-catenin into the nucleus and thus activates the Wnt/beta-catenin pathway, contributing to metastasis and progression of BRAF V600E CRC. Of note, HSPA8 directly interacts with the KIFSN motif on CAV1, the interaction can be enhanced by p38 MAPK-mediated CAV1 S168 phosphorylation. Furthermore, pharmacological targeting HSPA8 by VER155008 exhibits synergistic effects with BRAF inhibitors on CRC mouse models. In summary, these findings discover the important role of the HSPA8/CAV1/beta-catenin axis in the development of refractory BRAF V600E CRC and highlight HSPA8 as a predictive biomarker and therapeutic target in clinical practice.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据