4.6 Article

The effect of mixed culture fermentation of Saccharomyces cerevisiae and Saccharomyces cerevisiae var. diastaticus on fermentation parameters and flavor profile

期刊

JOURNAL OF FOOD SCIENCE
卷 -, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/1750-3841.16833

关键词

beer; brewing; diastatic yeast; flavor composition; mixed fermentation; modeling

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study aimed to investigate the impact of mixed fermentations on fermentation kinetics and concentration of volatile compounds. The results showed that the behavior of mixed fermentations was predictable and proportional to the mixture ratios. The mixed fermentations exhibited a combination of aroma profiles from two different yeast strains.
Belgian Saisons and Lambics are two well-known examples in the brewing industry of mixed fermentations, combination of two or more yeast and/or bacteria strains. The purpose of this study was to determine the impact different pitch rates of Saccharomyces cerevisiae (traditional brewing yeast) and S. cerevisiae var. diastaticus (a variant associated with Belgian styles) had on the fermentation kinetics and concentration of the volatile compounds in the finished beers. A series of brews were performed utilizing ratios of S. cerevisiae and diastaticus. The fermentations were heavily monitored, and a model was used to fit fermentation variables. It was found that mixed fermentations produced behaviors that were predictable and proportional to the mixture ratios. As expected, the pure cultural fermentations of diastaticus had a slower fermentation midpoint (M) at 45.45 h versus 28.28 h for S. cerevisiae with the mixed ones falling in between the two. Flavor and aroma play a key role in the acceptability of beer. The mixed fermentations showed a combination of the two different yeast strains aromatic profiles. When combined, there was a strong linearity between alcohols (R-2 = 0.94), esters (R-2 = 0.89), and the overall total (R-2 = 0.91) volatile compounds.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据