4.5 Article

Antitumor activities against breast cancers by an afucosylated anti-HER2 monoclonal antibody H2Mab-77-mG2a-f

期刊

CANCER SCIENCE
卷 -, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/cas.16008

关键词

ADCC; antitumor activity; CDC; HER2; monoclonal antibody

类别

向作者/读者索取更多资源

H(2) Mab-77-mG(2a)-f possesses specific binding affinity to HER2-positive breast cancer cells and exhibits antitumor effects.
Breast cancer patients with high levels of human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) expression have worse clinical outcomes. Anti-HER2 monoclonal antibody (mAb) is the most important therapeutic modality for HER2-positive breast cancer. We previously immunized mice with the ectodomain of HER2 to create the anti-HER2 mAb, H(2)Mab-77 (mouse IgG(1), kappa). This was then altered to produce H(2)Mab-77-mG(2a)-f, an afucosylated mouse IgG(2a). In the present work, we examined the reactivity of H(2)Mab-77-mG(2a)-f and antitumor effects against breast cancers in vitro and in vivo. BT-474, an endogenously HER2-expressing breast cancer cell line, was identified by H(2)Mab-77-mG(2a)-f with a strong binding affinity (a dissociation constant [K-D]: 5.0 x 10(-9) M). H(2)Mab-77-mG(2a)-f could stain HER2 of breast cancer tissues in immunohistochemistry and detect HER2 protein in Western blot analysis. Furthermore, H(2)Mab-77-mG(2a)-f demonstrated strong antibody-dependent cellular cytotoxicity (ADCC) and complement-dependent cytotoxicity (CDC) for BT-474 cells. MDA-MB-468, a HER2-negative breast cancer cell line, was unaffected by H(2)Mab-77-mG(2a)-f. Additionally, in the BT-474-bearing tumor xenograft model, H(2)Mab-77-mG(2a)-f substantially suppressed tumor development when compared with the control mouse IgG(2a) mAb. In contrast, the HER2-negative MDA-MB-468-bearing tumor xenograft model showed no response to H(2)Mab-77-mG(2a)-f. These findings point to the possibility of H(2)Mab-77-mG(2a)-f as a treatment regimen by showing that it has antitumor effects on HER2-positive breast tumors.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据