4.6 Article

Parity-Time Symmetric Holographic Principle

期刊

ENTROPY
卷 25, 期 11, 页码 -

出版社

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/e25111523

关键词

parity-time symmetry; holographic principal; quantum simulation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This article explores the relationship between the phenomenon of avoided level crossing and a spin-1/2 system evolving under a PT-symmetric Hamiltonian, using a simple example. It further generalizes this relationship to the eigenenergy problem of a bulk system with N spatial dimensions, showing that the eigenenergy state can be decoded through the propagation of the edge state in the temporal dimension, and this evolution is PT-symmetric.
Originating from the Hamiltonian of a single qubit system, the phenomenon of the avoided level crossing is ubiquitous in multiple branches of physics, including the Landau-Zener transition in atomic, molecular, and optical physics, the band structure of condensed matter physics and the dispersion relation of relativistic quantum physics. We revisit this fundamental phenomenon in the simple example of a spinless relativistic quantum particle traveling in (1+1)-dimensional space-time and establish its relation to a spin-1/2 system evolving under a PT-symmetric Hamiltonian. This relation allows us to simulate 1-dimensional eigenvalue problems with a single qubit. Generalizing this relation to the eigenenergy problem of a bulk system with N spatial dimensions reveals that its eigenvalue problem can be mapped onto the time evolution of the edge state with (N-1) spatial dimensions governed by a non-Hermitian Hamiltonian. In other words, the bulk eigenenergy state is encoded in the edge state as a hologram, which can be decoded by the propagation of the edge state in the temporal dimension. We argue that the evolution will be PT-symmetric as long as the bulk system admits parity symmetry. Our work finds the application of PT-symmetric and non-Hermitian physics in quantum simulation and provides insights into the fundamental symmetries.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据