4.7 Article

Development of basil seed mucilage (a heteropolysaccharide) - Polyvinyl alcohol biopolymers incorporating zinc oxide nanoparticles

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2023.127342

关键词

Basil seed mucilage; Polyvinyl alcohol; Zinc oxide nanoparticles

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The effect of zinc oxide nanoparticles on basil seed mucilage-polyvinyl alcohol films was investigated. The concentration of nanoparticles influenced the moisture content, solubility, permeability, mechanical properties, color, light transmission, and antibacterial and antifungal activities of the films.
The effect of zinc oxide nanoparticles (ZnONPs) on various properties of basil seed mucilage (a heteropolysaccharide)-polyvinyl alcohol (BSM-PVA) films was investigated. Increasing concentration of ZnONPs in BSM-PVA films reduced moisture content (from 24.73 to 17.09 %), water solubility (from 36.36 to 27.65 %), water vapor permeability (from 4.66 x 10(-7) to 2.55 x 10(-7) gm/m(2)Pah), oxygen permeability (from 2.96 to 2.13 cm(3) mu m/m(2) d kPa), and elongation at break (from 40.34 to 29.44 %), and increased ultimate tensile strength (from 16.81 to 21.48 MPa). Color and light transmission were affected by ZnONPs concentrations. The lack of formation of new peaks, along with the displacement of peaks, indicated the formation of hydrogen bonds between ZnONPs and the film matrix. Dynamic mechanical-thermal analysis showed that storage modulus and glass transition temperature increased with the concentration of ZnONPs. Scanning electron microscopy images illustrated that the addition of ZnONPs improved film integrity. X-ray diffraction pattern showed that the crystal shape of nanoparticles was preserved in the film matrix. Films containing ZnONPs showed good antibacterial activity against Staphylococcus aureus (reductions >= 3 log CFU/cm(2)) and Escherichia coli (reductions >= 4 log CFU/cm(2)). Films containing ZnONPs also showed a suitable antifungal activity during the storage of wheat bread.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据