4.5 Article

Concave microlens arrays with tunable curvature for enhanced photodegradation of organic pollutants in water: A non-contact approach

期刊

ECOMAT
卷 -, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/eom2.12426

关键词

microlens array; photodegradation; solar energy; water treatment

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study develops reusable concave microlens arrays (MLAs) for more efficient solar photodegradation by optimizing light distribution. The concave MLAs possess a non-contact reactor configuration and significantly enhance the photodegradation efficiency of organic pollutants in water.
Solar-driven photodegradation for water treatment faces challenges such as low energy conversion rates, high maintenance costs, and over-sensitivity to the environment. In this study, we develop reusable concave microlens arrays (MLAs) for more efficient solar photodegradation by optimizing light distribution. Concave MLAs with the base radius of similar to 5$$ \sim 5 $$ mu m are fabricated by imprinting convex MLAs to polydimethylsiloxane elastomers. Concave MLAs possess a non-contact reactor configuration, preventing MLAs from detaching or being contaminated. By precisely controlling the solvent exchange, concave MLAs are fabricated with well-defined curvature and adjustable volume on femtoliter scale. The focusing effects of MLAs are examined, and good agreement is presented between experiments and simulations. The photodegradation efficiency of organic pollutants in water is significantly enhanced by 5.1-fold, attributed to higher intensity at focal points of concave MLAs. Furthermore, enhanced photodegradation by concave MLAs is demonstrated under low light irradiation, applicable to real river water and highly turbid water.image Concave microlens arrays (MLAs) are peeled off the convex MLA template and then assembled in a solar-driven reactor for water treatment with a non-contact configuration. The light intensity profile of concave MLAs captured by confocal microscope is also displayed.image

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据