4.6 Review

Comparison of internet-based and face-to-face cognitive behavioral therapy for obsessive-compulsive disorder: A systematic review and network meta-analysis

期刊

JOURNAL OF PSYCHIATRIC RESEARCH
卷 168, 期 -, 页码 140-148

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.jpsychires.2023.10.025

关键词

Cognitive behavioral therapy; Obsessive-compulsive disorder; Internet-based; Network meta-analysis; Systematic review

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Internet-based cognitive behavioral therapy (ICBT) is an effective alternative to traditional cognitive behavioral therapy (CBT) for treating obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD). The study found that CBT was more effective than therapist-guided ICBT (TG-ICBT), but the difference between CBT and unguided ICBT (UG-ICBT) was not significant. In terms of efficacy, all three interventions (CBT, TG-ICBT, and UG-ICBT) were superior to psychological placebo, waiting list, and pill placebo. Combination therapy of CBT with medication was more effective than the individual interventions.
Cognitive behavioral therapy (CBT) is widely recognized as an effective treatment for obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD). However, few patients are able to receive CBT. Internet-based CBT (ICBT) may be able to overcome this problem. In this study, we aimed to compare the efficacy of CBT, therapist-guided ICBT (TG-ICBT), unguided ICBT (UG-ICBT), and none therapist-guided ICBT (NTG-ICBT) by a network meta-analysis. The primary outcome was the mean change in OCD severity measured by the Yale-Brown Obsessive Compulsive Scale (Y -BOCS) or the Children's Yale-Brown Obsessive Compulsive Scale (CY-BOCS). The secondary outcomes included the severity of depressive symptoms, side effects, and cost-effectiveness. A total of 25 trials with 1642 participants were included. We found that the efficacy of CBT was superior to that of TG-ICBT. The mean improvement in Y-BOCS/CY-BOCS scores was higher in CBT group than in UG-ICBT group, but this difference was not sta-tistically significant. The efficacy did not differ significantly between TG-ICBT and UG-ICBT. CBT, TG-ICBT, and UG-ICBT were all more effective than the psychological placebo, waiting list, and pill placebo. In terms of ef-ficacy, CBT combined with drug therapy was better than CBT, TG-ICBT, and UG-ICBT. Sensitivity analyses supported these findings. Based on the current evidence, we recommend TG-ICBT when CBT is not available. However, it is undeniable that UG-ICBT also has the potential to be an effective alternative to CBT. More evidence is needed to support this possibility.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据