4.7 Review

The roles of m6A methylation in cervical cancer: functions, molecular mechanisms, and clinical applications

期刊

CELL DEATH & DISEASE
卷 14, 期 11, 页码 -

出版社

SPRINGERNATURE
DOI: 10.1038/s41419-023-06265-2

关键词

-

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This article discusses the biogenesis of m6A, atypical expressions of m6A regulators, and their functions in cervical cancer. The modification of m6A in non-coding RNA is also elucidated. In the context of precision medicine, the application of m6A in clinical diagnosis and treatment of cervical cancer is summarized. Additionally, new perspectives on detection methods, immune regulation, and nano-drug development are presented.
Cervical cancer (CC) is a gynecological neoplasm with the highest incidence rate, primarily attributed to the persistent infection of high-risk Human papillomavirus (HPV). Despite extensive research, the pathogenesis of CC remains unclear. N6-methyladenosine (m6A) methylation, the most prevalent form of epigenetic modification in RNA, is intricately linked to cell proliferation, metastasis, metabolism, and therapeutic resistance within the tumor microenvironment (TME) of CC. The involvement of the writer, reader, and eraser in m6A modification impacts the advancement of tumors through the regulation of RNA stability, nuclear export, translation efficiency, and RNA degradation. Here, we discuss the biogenesis of m6A, the atypical expressions of m6A regulators, the mechanisms of molecular interactions, and their functions in CC. Furthermore, we elucidate m6A modification of non-coding RNA. In the context of precision medicine, and with the advancements of genomics, proteomics, and high-throughput sequencing technologies, we summarize the application of m6A in the clinical diagnosis and treatment of CC. Additionally, new perspectives on detection methods, immune regulation, and nano-drug development are presented, which lay the foundation for further research of m6A and provide new ideas for the clinical treatment of CC.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据