4.5 Article

Does drinking saccharin weaken an association of sweet with calories? Pre-exposure effects in flavor preference learning

期刊

PHYSIOLOGY & BEHAVIOR
卷 272, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.physbeh.2023.114381

关键词

Preference learning; Flavor-flavor; Flavor-nutrient; US-preexposure effect; Saccharin; Extinction

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The aim of this experiment was to examine the effect of exposure to non-nutritive sweeteners on the formation of a sweet-calorie association. The results showed that rats can form flavor-flavor and flavor-nutrient associations depending on their motivational state. However, prior exposure to non-nutritive sweeteners did not enhance subsequent learning about the nutritive properties of a sweet food.
The main aim of this experiment was to examine the claim that exposure to non-nutritive sweeteners weakens the formation of a sweet-calorie association. Three groups of food-deprived rats received training in which they drank an almond-flavored maltodextrin and saccharin solution. A final test phase assessed their preference for almond. The groups differed in preexposure prior to training. One was pre-exposed to saccharin, one to saccharin plus maltodextrin, and the third, control condition, received only water at this stage. When the rats continued under food deprivation for the test phase, the group exposed to the compound (saccharin plus maltodextrin) showed a weaker preference than the other two groups, while those pre-exposed to saccharin showed as strong a preference as the controls. When the test was conducted with the rats no longer food-deprived, only the water group showed a strong preference. These results support the proposal that rats can form both flavor-flavor and flavor-nutrient associations, expression of which will depend on motivational state. They did not find support for the suggestion that prior exposure to a non-nutritive sweetener can enhance subsequent learning about the nutritive properties of a sweet food.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据