4.6 Article

Relationship between long non-coding RNA MALAT1 and HOTAIR expression with sperm parameters, DNA and malondialdehyde levels in male infertility

期刊

TISSUE & CELL
卷 85, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

CHURCHILL LIVINGSTONE
DOI: 10.1016/j.tice.2023.102248

关键词

LncRNA; MALAT1; HOTAIR; DNA; Sperm

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The study found that the expression of lncRNA MALAT1 and HOTAIR is related to sperm quality, DNA fragmentation, and MDA levels. The expression level is positively correlated with sperm motility and morphology, and negatively correlated with DNA damage and MDA levels.
Background: Sperm quality is a complex index used to evaluate the fertility potential of men. The long non-coding RNA (lncRNA) MALAT1 participate in sperm development and HOTAIR have critical roles in the regulation of oxidative stress responses. This study aimed to evaluate the relationship of lncRNA MALAT1 and HOTAIR expression with sperm parameters, DNA fragmentation and malondialdehyde (MDA)levels in sperm fertility.Methods: In this experimental study, semen samples (n = 30 fertile, n = 30 infertile) men were collected and evaluated for sperm parameters by computer-aided sperm analysis(CASA). Sperm DNA integrity quality was assessed by the Acridine orange(AO) test. MDA levels were determined by the Thiobarbituric acid reaction method. The expression of MALAT1 and HOTAIR was detected by RT-PCR.Results: We observed a decreased level of MALAT1and HOTAIR expression in the infertile men (p < 0.001). The relative expression level of MALAT1and HOTAIR showed a positive correlation with motility and morphology (p < 0.001). Subsequently, we found the DNA damage and MDA levels was negatively correlated with expression level of genes of sperm (p < 0.001).Conclusion: In this study the low expression of MALATI and HOTAIR resulted in the high level of MDA, DNA damage, and reduced motility of sperm. This study suggests the therapeutic opportunities in respect to MALATI and HOTAIR expression in the sperm function.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据