4.7 Article

Microalgae biomass production using wastewater: Treatment and costs Scale-up considerations

期刊

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.algal.2016.03.010

关键词

Bubble column photobioreactor; Wastewater treatment; Electrocoagulation; Solar drying; Scale-up

资金

  1. project WW-SIP - From Urban Wastewater Treatment Plant to Self-Sustainable Integrated Platform for Wastewater Refinement [LIFE10 ENV/IT/000308]
  2. Fundacao para a Ciencia e Tecnologia [SFRH/BPD/95098/2013]
  3. FCT [IF/00181/2012]
  4. [IDL-UID/GEO/50019/2013]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This work is part of a LIFE project to treat urban wastewater from Aguas da Figueira (AdF, Figueira da Foz, PT) using a vertical tubular photobioreactor (PBR) prototype (150 L), to be scaled up and integrated in a waste water treatment plant (WWTP). The PBR was inoculated with three different microalgae: Chlorella vulgaris (Cv), Scenedesmus obliquus (Sc) and Consortium C (ConsC), isolated from the effluent. The study intends to find the best microalga in terms of wastewater remediation, biomass productivity and quality, for further uses, such as biofuel, biofertilizer and bioplastic production. The experiments achieved volumetric productivities of 0.1 g/L.d (Cv), 0.4 g/L.d (Sc) and 0.(g/L.d (ConsC). The maximum removals attained by Cv, Sc and ConsC were: 84, 95 and 98% for total nitrogen; 95, 92 and 100% for phosphorus; and 36, 63 and 64% for COD, respectively. The treated water had values that are in accordance with environmental legislation (Directive 98/15/CE). Electrocoagulation was tested and resulted in an energy saving of 89%, compared with centrifugation alone. For drying the biomass, a solar dryer was used. Costs of overall processes versus conventional technologies are discussed and compared with other facilities and target values. (C) 2016 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据