4.6 Article

Cavity-birefringence-dependent vector pure-quartic soliton fiber laser

期刊

OPTICS EXPRESS
卷 31, 期 22, 页码 35529-35541

出版社

Optica Publishing Group
DOI: 10.1364/OE.501059

关键词

-

类别

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study numerically observes the generation and evolution dynamics of vector PQS in a mode-locked fiber laser using coupled Ginzburg-Landau equations. The results show that both elliptical-polarization vector PQS and near-linear-polarization vector PQS can be formed depending on the cavity-birefringence. Additionally, a transition from vector PQS to scalar PQS is observed with higher cavity-birefringence.
Pure-quartic soliton (PQS) fiber lasers provide a promising avenue for exploring novel soliton interaction dynamics and generating high-energy pulses. Here, we present the numerical observation of vector PQSs generation and the evolution dynamics in a mode-locked fiber laser, using the coupled Ginzburg-Landau equations. We investigate the buildup dynamics of vector PQSs in a mode-locked laser with birefringent fibers, passing through three stages: energy amplification, energy pulsation owing to the cross-phase modulation (XPM) effect, and finally stabilization. Depending on the strength of the cavity-birefringence, the evolution of PQSs in non-polarization-maintaining fibers reveals that both the elliptical-polarization vector PQSs and near-linear-polarization vector PQSs can be formed by the energy conservation and balance between the two orthogonal directions. Additionally, we observe the transition process from vector PQSs to scalar PQSs with higher cavity-birefringence, resulting from the failure compensation of the walk-off via the soliton trapping effect between the two orthogonal components. These results provide valuable insights into the ultrafast transient process of vector solitons and enhance the understanding of PQS generation in fiber lasers. (c) 2023 Optica Publishing Group under the terms of the Optica Open Access Publishing Agreement

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据