4.7 Article

Exogenous L-Alanine promotes phagocytosis of multidrug-resistant bacterial pathogens

期刊

EMBO REPORTS
卷 -, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.15252/embr.201949561

关键词

L-Alanine; metabolic regulation; phagocytosis; PI3K/Akt and NF-kappa B pathway; TLR-4

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Multidrug-resistant bacteria pose a significant threat to public health. Through proteomic and metabolomic analyses, the study identified a correlation between L-Alanine metabolism and phagocytosis with mouse survival in Vibrio parahaemolyticus infection. Experimental validation showed that exogenous L-Alanine promoted phagocytosis of multidrug-resistant pathogens, revealing the underlying mechanism.
Multidrug-resistant bacteria present a major threat to public health that urgently requires new drugs or treatment approaches. Here, we conduct integrated proteomic and metabolomics analyses to screen for molecular candidates improving survival of mice infected with Vibrio parahaemolyticus, which indicate that L-Alanine metabolism and phagocytosis are strongly correlated with mouse survival. We also assess the role of L-Alanine in improving mouse survival by in vivo bacterial challenge experiments using various bacteria species, including V. parahaemolyticus, Escherichia coli, Pseudomonas aeruginosa, and Klebsiella pneumoniae. Functional studies demonstrate that exogenous L-Alanine promotes phagocytosis of these multidrug-resistant pathogen species. We reveal that the underlying mechanism involves two events boosted by L-Alanine: TLR4 expression and L-Alanine-enhanced TLR4 signaling via increased biosynthesis and secretion of fatty acids, including palmitate. Palmitate enhances binding of lipopolysaccharide to TLR4, thereby promoting TLR4 dimer formation and endocytosis for subsequent activation of the PI3K/Akt and NF-kappa B pathways and bacteria phagocytosis. Our data suggest that modulation of the metabolic environment is a plausible approach for combating multidrug-resistant bacteria infection.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据