4.8 Article

The importance of oxygen for explaining rapid shifts in a marine fish

期刊

GLOBAL CHANGE BIOLOGY
卷 -, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/gcb.17008

关键词

fisheries; marine biogeography; Metabolic Index; oxygen; physiology; species distribution modeling; species shifts; temperature

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Large-scale shifts in marine species distribution due to climate change require understanding of multiple factors, including temperature, oxygen, prey, and salinity. The study found that oxygen and prey contribute significantly to the changing biogeography of Black Sea Bass, while the Metabolic Index did not show substantial improvement in model performance.
Large-scale shifts in marine species biogeography have been a notable impact of climate change. An effective explanation of what drives these species shifts, as well as accurate predictions of where they might move, is crucial to effectively managing these natural resources and conserving biodiversity. While temperature has been implicated as a major driver of these shifts, physiological processes suggest that oxygen, prey, and other factors should also play important roles. We expanded upon previous temperature-based distribution models by testing whether oxygen, food web productivity, salinity, and scope for metabolic activity (the Metabolic Index) better explained the changing biogeography of Black Sea Bass (Centropristis striata) in the Northeast US. This species has been expanding further north over the past 15 years. We found that oxygen improved model performance beyond a simple consideration of temperature (Delta AIC = 799, Delta TSS = 0.015), with additional contributions from prey and salinity. However, the Metabolic Index did not substantially increase model performance relative to temperature and oxygen (Delta AIC = 0.63, Delta TSS = 0.0002). Marine species are sensitive to oxygen, and we encourage researchers to use ocean biogeochemical hindcast and forecast products to better understand marine biogeographic changes.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据