4.8 Article

Managing mineral phosphorus application with soil residual phosphorus reuse in Canada

期刊

GLOBAL CHANGE BIOLOGY
卷 -, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/gcb.17001

关键词

biogeochemical cycles; phosphorus fertilizer; soil phosphorus loss; water quality

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The utilization of residual soil phosphorus in agricultural soils is important for reducing phosphorus applications and pollution. The potential for using residual soil phosphorus varies among Canadian provinces, with the highest potential in the Atlantic provinces, Quebec, Ontario, and British Columbia.
With limited phosphorus (P) supplies, increasing P demand, and issues with P runoff and pollution, developing an ability to reuse the large amounts of residual P stored in agricultural soils is increasingly important. In this study, we investigated the potential for residual soil P to maintain crop yields while reducing P applications and losses in Canada. Using a P cycling model coupled with a soil P dynamics model, we analyzed soil P dynamics over 110 years across Canada's provinces. We found that using soil residual P may reduce mineral P demand as large as 132 Gg P year(-1) (29%) in Canada, with the highest potential for reducing P applications in the Atlantic provinces, Quebec, Ontario, and British Columbia. Using residual soil P would result in a 21% increase in Canada's cropland P use efficiency. We expected that the Atlantic provinces and Quebec would have the greatest runoff P loss reduction with use of residual soil P, with the average P loss rate decreasing from 4.24 and 1.69 kg ha(-1) to 3.45 and 1.38 kg ha(-1), respectively. Ontario, Manitoba, and British Columbia would experience relatively lower reductions in P loss through use of residual soil P, with the average runoff P loss rate decreasing from 0.44, 0.36, and 4.33 kg ha(-1) to 0.19, 0.26, and 4.14 kg ha(-1), respectively. Our study highlights the importance of considering residual soil P as a valuable resource and its potential for reducing P pollution.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据