4.7 Article

Techno-economic modelling for energy cost minimisation of a university campus to support electric vehicle charging with photovoltaic capacity optimisation

期刊

RENEWABLE ENERGY
卷 219, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.renene.2023.119427

关键词

Electric vehicle; Workplace charging; Renewable energy sources; Solar photovoltaic; Net cost optimisation; Particle swarm optimisation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study proposes a novel modeling approach to minimize the net annual energy cost of a university campus providing EV charging service. Results show that using this method can reduce peak demand and net annual energy cost, with the reduction increasing with EV penetration.
Workplace charging of Electric Vehicles (EV) is a promising approach for transport decarbonization while addressing issues emerging from renewable energy growth. For workplaces, the decision to invest in EV charging infrastructure depends on the overall cost of providing this service. This study proposes a novel modelling approach to minimize the net annual energy cost of a university campus providing EV charging service using optimum capacity solar photovoltaic (PV) systems. The research includes an innovative approach to determine the campus EV charging demand and a novel net annual energy cost minimisation method combining PV size optimisation and EV charging control. A comprehensive analysis is presented to illustrate the influence of EV penetration, charging strategy, charging fees, charger cost and PV generation cost on the campus net annual energy cost. The influence of these parameters are also analysed on the optimal PV capacity, power and energy demand, and PV self-utilisation. Results show that, by using the proposed method, for 25 % EV penetration, the campus's peak demand is reduced by around 12 % and net annual energy cost is reduced by up to 9.2 % while providing free EV charging. The net annual energy cost reduction increases to over 20 % for 100 % EV penetration.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据