4.4 Article

Narrowing the Research-to-Practice Gap in Effective Professional Development in a State Preschool Program: Describing the Process and Findings from a Research-Practice Partnership

期刊

EARLY CHILDHOOD RESEARCH QUARTERLY
卷 66, 期 -, 页码 157-167

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.ecresq.2023.09.004

关键词

Preschool; Professional development; Research-practice partnership; Descriptive analysis; Statewide implementation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study describes the implementation and findings of a consultation process aimed at improving the professional development for teachers in Virginia's state-funded preschool program. The study developed a PD Rubric to evaluate the alignment of PD practices with evidence-based practices and provide personalized consultations. The findings highlight the need for improvement in providing PD that supports teachers in refining their teaching skills. Preschool leaders found the consultation process valuable, particularly the discussions with their consultants.
This study describes the implementation and findings from a consultation process designed to enhance the professional development (PD) offered to teachers working in Virginia's state-funded preschool program. A PD Rubric was developed to translate research on effective PD (i.e., PD practices linked to positive changes in teacher practice and/or child outcomes), systematically assess the extent to which business as usual PD across 122 school divisions aligns to evidence-based practices, and guide individualized PD consultation calls with preschool leaders. Findings indicated that the area of PD with the greatest room for improvement was providing PD that supports teachers to refine their teaching skills, as opposed to only gain knowledge. Early childhood leaders reported that the PD consultation process was valuable, particularly talking with their consultant. Findings from this study provide insight into how to bridge research and practice around supporting the delivery of effective PD for preschool teachers at scale.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据