4.7 Article

Topology optimization and numerical analysis of cold plates for concentrating photovoltaic thermal management

期刊

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.csite.2023.103713

关键词

Thermal management; Photovoltaic panel; Topology optimization; Multi-objective optimization; Net output power

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study improves the internal flow channel structure of PV panel cooling systems using topology optimization techniques, resulting in better cooling performance and increased power output. The results show that the topology optimized flow channel configuration is more effective in reducing solar cell temperature and increasing net power output compared to the traditional straight channel configuration.
Continuous advances in concentrating photovoltaic (CPV) panel efficiency are increasingly affected by cell temperature. Improving PV panel cooling performance is critical. This application optimizes the internal flow channel structure of PV panel cooling systems using topology optimization techniques like multi-objective and multi-stage optimization with penalty factors. Three-dimensional CFD simulation is used to compare the heat transfer performance of topology optimized channel cooling configuration and traditional straight channel cooling configuration for photovoltaic panel systems. Effects of inlet flow rates, concentration ratios, and other parameters on cooling performance are investigated. Results show the topology optimized flow channel configuration has better cooling than the straight channel. At different concentration ratios, the solar cell temperature reduces 13.85%-23.45%. The optimized application also has lower inlet and outlet pressure drops for the same operating conditions, requiring less external power. Compared to the straight channel, the topology optimized flow channel increases net PV system output power 3.00%-19.37% at different concentration ratios. Applying topology optimization provides new ideas for optimizing PV cooling system designs.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据