4.7 Article

Molecular biomarkers for sperm quality in an economically important fish: Blue catfish, Ictalurus furcatus

期刊

AQUACULTURE
卷 579, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.aquaculture.2023.740220

关键词

Aquaculture; Assisted reproduction; Transcriptomics; Sperm quality; miRNA

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Intraspecies variability in sperm quality is common among aquaculture species, and there is an urgent need to establish reliable molecular biomarkers for screening males with high-quality sperm. In this study, gene expression biomarkers of sperm quality in channel catfish blue catfish hybrids were identified, which may be applied to improve catfish aquaculture efficiency.
Intraspecies variability in sperm quality is common among aquaculture species, thus necessitating an urgent need to establish reliable molecular biomarkers to screen for males with high-quality sperm. The channel catfish (Ictalurus punctatus) female x blue catfish (I. furcatus) male hybrid accounts for >50% of United States catfish production. Blue catfish sperm cannot be collected using non-lethal methods, and thus, males must be sacrificed to determine reproductive quality. To establish gene expression biomarkers of sperm quality, we characterized important sperm traits, ranked blue catfish males based on the curvilinear velocity of their sperm, and sequenced testicular tissue for mRNAs and sRNAs. Of the 43 males characterized, testicular tissue from 4 individuals with low-velocity (155.70 mm/s +/- 1.49 SD) and 4 with high-velocity (205.01 mm/s +/- 4.63 SD) were chosen for sequencing. No differentially expressed sRNAs were detected between the two sperm performance groups. However, we identified two differentially expressed mRNA transcripts between the low-velocity and high-velocity groups, aqp3a and ly97.3, both upregulated in the high-velocity group compared to the low-velocity group. These molecular biomarkers of sperm quality in testicular tissue are linked to gamete quality and may be applied for more efficient catfish aquaculture.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据