4.6 Article

Numerical simulation of fracturing and imbibition in shale oil horizontal wells

期刊

PETROLEUM SCIENCE
卷 20, 期 5, 页码 2981-3001

出版社

KEAI PUBLISHING LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.petsci.2023.03.024

关键词

Shale oil; Hydraulic fracturing; Imbibition exchange volume; Oil-water two-phase flow; Shut-in time

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The study establishes a model for the imbibition process in shale oil reservoirs and investigates the effects of capillary force, osmotic pressure, and pressure difference on imbibition. It is found that capillary force and osmotic pressure increase imbibition rate and decrease imbibition equilibrium time, while pressure difference does not affect the peak of imbibition exchange volume. Reservoir permeability, natural fracture density, and the number of interconnected fractures significantly impact imbibition equilibrium time.
The shale oil reservoir is characterized by tight lithology and ultra-low permeability, and its efficient exploitation requires the technology of multi-stage and multi-cluster hydraulic fracturing in horizontal wells and shut-in imbibition. After multi-stage and multi-cluster hydraulic fracturing, a complex fracture network is formed, and a large volume of frac fluid is stored within the fracture network. During shut-in, imbibition and exchange between oil and water occurs under the action of the capillary force and os-motic pressure, and the formation pressure builds up in the shale reservoir. On basis of the characteristics of shale oil reservoir, we establish a model of imbibition during fracturing injection and shut-in by coupling oil-water two-phase flow and saline ion diffusion in the hydraulic fractures (HFs) network, natural fractures (NFs) and matrix system under the action of capillary force and osmotic pressure. The DFN method and the multiple continuum method are introduced to characterize fluid flow between the HF and the NF and that between the NF and the matrix respectively, which avoids the problem of a large amount of computation of seepage within the complex fracture. Then, the discrete fracture network (DFN) model and the multiple continuum model are solved with the finite element method, and it is verified in flow field, saturation field and concentration field that the models are accurate and reliable. We propose the imbibition exchange volume for quantitative evaluation of the imbibition degree and a method of calculating the imbibition exchange volume. Simulation of oil and water flow in the fracturing and shut-in stages is performed based on these models. It is found that imbibition in the shale reservoir is driven by mechanisms of pressure difference, capillary force and osmotic pressure. The osmotic pressure and capillary force only cause an increase in the imbibition rate and a reduction in the imbi-bition equilibrium time and do not lead to variation in the peak of imbibition exchange volume. The imbibition equilibrium time under the action of the capillary force and osmotic pressure is reduced from 150 to 45 d compared with that under the action of the pressure difference. If imbibition equilibrium is reached, low initial water saturation, strong rock compressibility, high formation water salinity and high matrix permeability enhance imbibition and exchange of oil and water in the reservoir. The leakoff volume of frac fluid is generally larger than the imbibition exchanged volume. Leakoff equilibrium occurs slightly earlier than imbibition equilibrium. The imbibition equilibrium time is mainly affected by reservoir permeability and NF density. The number of interconnected fractures mainly affects the frac fluid volume within the hydraulic fracture in the fracturing process. The stimulated reservoir volume (SRV) mainly affects frac fluid imbibition exchange in the shut-in process.(c) 2023 The Authors. Publishing services by Elsevier B.V. on behalf of KeAi Communications Co. Ltd. This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/ 4.0/).

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据